致病疫霉诱导放线菌Sy11菌株的抑菌作用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2018.06.011致病疫霉诱导放线菌Sy11菌株的抑菌作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在筛选致病疫霉拮抗菌过程中,发现放线菌Sy11菌株对致病疫霉的抑制作用是由于致病疫霉对Sy11的诱导作用.为了进一步明确致病疫霉对Sy11的诱导方式和条件,采用平板对峙共培养法探讨了致病疫霉诱导Sy11的适宜培养基、培养温度、培养时间以及诱导后Sy11菌株抑菌作用的持续时间等.结果显示,只有活体致病疫霉才能诱导Sy11的抑菌作用,死亡的致病疫霉菌体没有诱导作用;用黑麦培养基20 ℃黑暗对峙培养7 d,从Sy11菌落向外12 mm处的无菌体琼脂块的抑菌作用最强,抑菌率达到79.38%,与Sy11菌株完整菌落的抑菌率86.47%相近;而且发现致病疫霉诱导1次后,Sy11的抑菌能力即可连续传递13代,且抑菌率保持在65%以上.这些结果表明,Sy11是在受到活体致病疫霉诱导之后才对致病疫霉有抑制作用,且抑菌作用具有遗传性.

关键词: 致病疫霉, 放线菌, 相互感应, 抑菌作用, 诱导

Abstract: Actinomycetes Streptomyces microflavus Sy11 strain had strong suppression to mycelial growth and sporangia germination of Phytophthora infestans. And it was found that suppression was induced by P. infestans during antagonists screening in early experiments. In order to further reveal the induction effect and conditions of P. infestans to strain Sy11, dual culture method was used for investigating the suitable culture medium, temperature, time, and continual inhibition of Sy11 strain after induction. The results showed that only the alive P. infestans could induce the inhibition effect of Sy11, dead P. infestans could not; The strongest restrain of Sy11 was found on Rye medium, 20 ℃ for culture 7 d in dark, with free cell agar block which was 12 mm from Sy11 colony edge, the inhibition rate reached 79.38% and- DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2018.06.011致病疫霉诱导放线菌Sy11菌株的抑菌作用蒋继志¹,王雪宁¹,李成斌¹,张荷花¹,李兵²(1.河北大学生命科学学院,河北保定 071002;2.邢台医学高等专科学校基础医学部,河北邢台 054000)摘要:在筛选致病疫霉拮抗菌过程中,发现放线菌Sy11菌株对致病疫霉的抑制作用是由于致病疫霉对Sy11的诱导作用.为了进一步明确致病疫霉对Sy11的诱导方式和条件,采用平板对峙共培养法探讨了致病疫霉诱导Sy11的适宜培养基、培养温度、培养时间以及诱导后Sy11菌株抑菌作用的持续时间等.结果显示,只有活体致病疫霉才能诱导Sy11的抑菌作用,死亡的致病疫霉菌体没有诱导作用;用黑麦培养基20 ℃黑暗对峙培养7 d,从Sy11菌落向外12 mm处的无菌体琼脂块的抑菌作用最强,抑菌率达到79.38%,与Sy11菌株完整菌落的抑菌率86.47%相近;而且发现致病疫霉诱导1次后,Sy11的抑菌能力即可连续传递13代,且抑菌率保持在65%以上.这些结果表明,Sy11是在受到活体致病疫霉诱导之后才对致病疫霉有抑制作用,且抑菌作用具有遗传性.关键词:致病疫霉;放线菌;相互感应;抑菌作用;诱导中图分类号:S435.32 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1000-1565(2018)06-0623-09Antagonistic effect of Streptomyces microflavus Sy11 strain induced by Phytophthora infestansJIANG Jizhi¹,WANG Xuening¹, LI Chengbin¹, ZHANG Hehua¹, LI Bing²(1.College of Life Sciences,Hebei University,Baoding 071002,China;2. Ministry of Basic Medicine,Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai 054000,China )Abstract:Actinomycetes Streptomyces microflavus Sy11 strain had strong suppression to mycelial growth and sporangia germination of Phytophthora infestans. And it was found that suppression was induced by P. infestans during antagonists screening in early experiments. In order to further reveal the induction effect and conditions of P. infestans to strain Sy11, dual culture method was used for investigating the suitable culture medium, temperature, time, and continual inhibition of Sy11 strain after induction. The results showed that only the alive P. infestans could induce the inhibition effect of Sy11, dead P. infestans could not; The strongest restrain of Sy11 was found on Rye medium, 20 ℃ for culture 7 d in dark, with free cell agar block which was 12 mm from Sy11 colony edge, the inhibition rate reached 79.38% and- 收稿日期:2018-01-31 基金项目:河北省自然科学基金资助项目(C 2015201231);公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303018) 第一作者:蒋继志(1960—),男,宁夏中宁人,河北大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事植物病害生物防治及其分子机理研究.E-mail:jizhijiang909@163.com 通信作者:李兵(1978—),男,河北邢台人,邢台医学高等专科学校讲师,主要从事生物化学与药学研究.E-mail:liyanhd81@163.com第6期蒋继志等:致病疫霉诱导放线菌Sy11菌株的抑菌作用was close to that of whole colony of Sy11 strain(86.47%). In addition, prohibition capability of Sy11 could be continuously transmited for 13 generations after only once induction, and inhibition rate could remain above 65%. These findings suggest only alive P. infestans can induce the inhibition effect of Sy11, and the capability of Sy11 has inheritance.

Key words: Phytophthora infestans, Streptomyces microflavus, mutual induction, antagonistic effect, induction

中图分类号:

S435.32

蒋继志,王雪宁,李成斌,张荷花,李兵. 致病疫霉诱导放线菌Sy11菌株的抑菌作用[J]. 河北大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 38(6): 623-631.

JIANG Jizhi,WANG Xuening, LI Chengbin, ZHANG Hehua, LI Bing. Antagonistic effect of Streptomyces microflavus Sy11 strain induced by Phytophthora infestans[J]. Journal of Hebei University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 38(6): 623-631.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: //xbzrb.hbu.edu.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2018.06.011致病疫霉诱导放线菌Sy11菌株的抑菌作用

//xbzrb.hbu.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V38/I6/623

参考文献

[1] HAN M, LIU G, LI J P, et al. Phytophthora infestans field isolates from Gansu province, China are genetically highly diverse and show a high frequency of self fertility [J]. Eukaryot Microbiol, 2013, 60(1):79-88.DOI: 10.1111/jeu.12010.
[2] 孙银银.西北部分地区致病疫霉菌的交配型分布和遗传多样性初步分析[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2010. SUN Y Y.Preliminary analysis of mating type distribution and genetic diversity of phytophthora infestans in northwestern China[D].Yangling: Northwest A&F University,2010.
[3] BENGTSSON T, HOLEFORS A, LILJEROTH E, et al. Biosurfactants have the potential to induce defence against Phytophthora infestans, in potato[J]. Potato Research, 2015, 58(1):83-90.DOI: 10.1007/s11540-015-9286-4.
[4] SINGH V K, PUNDHIR V S. Population structure and resistance to metalaxyl in isolates of Phytophthora infestans[J]. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2013, 66(4):53-56.DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-03-14-0073-R.
[5] CéSPEDES M C, CáRDENAS M E, VARGAS A M, et al. Physiological and molecular characterization of Phytophthora infestans, isolates from the Central Colombian Andean Region [J]. Revista Iberoamericana De Micología, 2013, 30(2):81-87.DOI: 10.1016/j.riam.2012.09.005.
[6] 李颖,蒋继志,金鑫. 3株放线菌对致病疫霉抑制作用的比较研究[J]. 中国植保导刊,2016,36(09):11-15. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6820.2016.09.002. LI Y, JIANG J Z, JIN X.Inhibition comparison of three actinomyces against Phytophthora infestans[J]. China Plant Protection,2016,36(09):11-15. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6820.2016.09.002.
[7] 张亚辉,蒋继志,王蓓蓓. 三株拮抗菌对导致马铃薯晚疫病的致病疫霉的抑制作用比较[J]. 作物杂志,2016(4):162-166. DOI:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.04.028. ZHANG Y H, JIANG J Z, WANG B B. Comparison of three antagonistic bacteria against Phytophthora infestans in potato[J]. Crops, 2016(4):162-166. DOI:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.04.028.
[8] 刘月,蒋继志,郭俊亭. 致病疫霉拮抗放线菌的筛选及抑菌作用初步研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2012,35(3):82-85.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1573.2012.03.015. LIU Y, JIANG J Z, GUO J T. Scewwning of antagonistic actinomycetic strains and their inhibitions against Phytophthora infestans[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei,2012,35(3):82-85.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1573.2012. 03.015.
[9] 徐德阳,王莉莉,杜春梅. 微生物共培养技术的研究进展[J]. 微生物学报,2015,55(9):1089-1096. DOI:10.13343/ j.cnki.wsxb.20140582. XU D Y, WANG L L, DU C M. Progress in microbial co-culture: a review[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica,2015,55(9): 1089-1096. DOI:10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20140582.
[10] CARLSON S, TANOUYE U, OMARSDOTTIR S, et al. Phylum-specific regulation of resistomycin production in a Streptomyces sp. via microbial coculture[J]. Journal of Natural Products, 2015,78(3):381-387.DOI: 10.1021/np500767u.
[11] 张辉,刘秋,于基成. 对峙间隔法诱导培养对放线菌抑菌活性的影响[J]. 中国抗生素杂志,2015,40(8):579-583.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8689.2015.08.004. ZHANG H, LIU Q, YU J C. The influence on the antimicrobial activity of actinomycte by opposite induction culture technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Antibiotics,2015,40(8):579-583.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8689.2015.08.004.
[12] MENG L H, LIU Y, LI X M, et al. Citrifelins A and B, citrinin adducts with a tetracyclic framework from cocultures of marine-derived isolates of Penicillium citrinum and Beauveria felina[J]. Journal of Natural Products, 2015, 78(9):2301.DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00450.
[13] RATEB M E, HALLYBURTON I, HOUSSEN W E, et al. Induction of diverse secondary metabolites in Aspergillus fumigatus by microbial co-culture[J]. Rsc Advances, 2013, 3(34):14444-14450.DOI: 10.1039/C3RA42378F.
[14] 姜滢滢,朱双双,章苗. 微生物共培养研究进展[J]. 中国微生态学杂志,2017,29(2):239-244.DOI:10.13381/ j.cnki.cjm.201702031. JIANG Y Y, ZHU S S, ZHANG M. Progress in research on microbial co-culturing[J]. Chinese Journal of Microecology,2017,29(2):239-244.DOI:10.13381/j.cnki.cjm.201702031.
[15] 黄英菊,蒋继志,冯丽娜. 几种拮抗菌对致病疫霉抑制作用的比较研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2014,37(4):80-85.DOI:10.13320/j.cnki.jauh.2014.0093. HUANG Y J, JIANG J Z, FENG L N. Inhibition comparison of several antagonists against Phytophthora infestans[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei,2014,37(4):80-85.DOI:10.13320/j.cnki.jauh.2014.0093.
[16] 王游游,蒋继志,田荟遥.拮抗放线菌Sy11菌株感应的致病疫霉信号分子初步研究[J].作物杂志,2017(4):150-154.DOI:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.04.025. WANG Y Y, JIANG J Z, TIAN H Y. Preliminary study on the signal molecule of Phytophthora infestans responsed by antagonistic actinomycetes strain Sy11[J].Crops, 2017(4):150-154.DOI:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.04.025.
[17] HOSHINO S, OKADA M, WAKIMOTO T, et al. Niizalactams A-C, multicyclic macrolactams isolated from combined culture of Streptomyces with Mycolic Acid-Containing Bacterium[J]. Nat Prod, 2015, 78(12):3011-3017.DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00804.
[18] CARLSON S, TANOUYE U, OMARSDOTTIR S, et al. Phylum-specific regulation of resistomycin production in a Streptomyces sp. via microbial coculture.[J]. Journal of Natural Products, 2015,78(3):381-387.DOI: 10.1021/np500767u.
[19] HALTERMAN D A, CHEN Y, SOPEE J, et al. Competition between Phytophthora infestans effectors leads to increased aggressiveness on plants containing broad-spectrum late blight resistance[J]. Plos One, 2010, 5(5):e10536.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010536
[20] 马振川.疫霉菌一个新病原相关模式分子PsXEG1的鉴定和功能分析[D].南京:南京农业大学,2015. MA Z C. Identification and functional characterizations of a novel pamp PsXEG1 on in Phytophthora[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2015.