铜绿假单胞菌耐药性与抗菌药物使用强度相关性分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2021.02.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了给临床合理使用抗菌药物提供科学依据,回顾性调查了医院2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日铜绿假单胞菌耐药率变化趋势及同一时间段抗菌药物年用量,计算使用频度,分析了抗菌药物使用强度与铜绿假单胞菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa)耐药率的相关性.分析结果显示:铜绿假单胞菌对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、庆大霉素、头孢哌酮/舒巴坦、头孢哌酮、头孢吡肟、亚胺培南西司他丁、氨曲南、阿米卡星、奈替米星和左氧氟沙星的耐药率均呈下降趋势;碳青霉烯类、三代头孢抗菌药物使用强度(antibiotics use density,AUD)增长明显(P<0.05),头孢吡肟、大环内酯类AUD下降明显(P<0.05),哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、氨基糖苷、喹诺酮类、单环β内酰胺类AUD无显著变化(P>0.05);碳青霉烯类、三代头孢AUD与铜绿假单胞菌耐药率呈正相关(r=0.523、0.605,P<0.05),哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、单环β内酰胺类、喹诺酮类、大环内酯类、氨基糖苷类、四代头孢与铜绿假单胞菌耐药率无关(r=0.012~0.136,P>0.05).分析结果表明:2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日医院铜绿假单胞菌的耐药率控制较好,铜绿假单胞菌耐药率与抗菌药物使用强度有关.临床应重视对抗生素的管理,减少细菌耐药的产生及其对人类健康的威胁.

关键词: 铜绿假单胞菌, 耐药性, 抗菌药物, 使用强度

Abstract: To provide scientific basis for the clinical rational use of antimicrobial agents, the trend of drug resistance rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the annual dosage of antimicrobial agents in the same period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 in a hospital were retrospectively investigated, the frequency of use was calculated, and the correlation between the antibiotics use density(AUD)and drug resistance rate of P. aeruginosa was analyzed. Analysis results show that the drug resistance rate of P. aeruginosa to piperacillin/tazobactam, gentamicin, cefoperazone/sulbactam, cefoperazone, cefepime, imipenem- DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2021.02.012铜绿假单胞菌耐药性与抗菌药物使用强度相关性分析张新颖¹,韩颖¹,王雅妹¹,杜凤芹¹,张晋¹,曹松云²(1.河北大学附属医院感染控制办公室,河北保定 071000;2.保定市第一中医院药物临床试验机构办公室,河北保定 071000)摘要:为了给临床合理使用抗菌药物提供科学依据,回顾性调查了医院2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日铜绿假单胞菌耐药率变化趋势及同一时间段抗菌药物年用量,计算使用频度,分析了抗菌药物使用强度与铜绿假单胞菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa)耐药率的相关性.分析结果显示:铜绿假单胞菌对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、庆大霉素、头孢哌酮/舒巴坦、头孢哌酮、头孢吡肟、亚胺培南西司他丁、氨曲南、阿米卡星、奈替米星和左氧氟沙星的耐药率均呈下降趋势;碳青霉烯类、三代头孢抗菌药物使用强度(antibiotics use density,AUD)增长明显(P<0.05),头孢吡肟、大环内酯类AUD下降明显(P<0.05),哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、氨基糖苷、喹诺酮类、单环β内酰胺类AUD无显著变化(P>0.05);碳青霉烯类、三代头孢AUD与铜绿假单胞菌耐药率呈正相关(r=0.523、0.605,P<0.05),哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、单环β内酰胺类、喹诺酮类、大环内酯类、氨基糖苷类、四代头孢与铜绿假单胞菌耐药率无关(r=0.012~0.136,P>0.05).分析结果表明:2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日医院铜绿假单胞菌的耐药率控制较好,铜绿假单胞菌耐药率与抗菌药物使用强度有关.临床应重视对抗生素的管理,减少细菌耐药的产生及其对人类健康的威胁.关键词:铜绿假单胞菌;耐药性;抗菌药物;使用强度中图分类号:R96;R446.5 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1000-1565(2021)02-0188-07Analysis of the correlation between drug resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and antibiotics use densityZHANG Xinying¹, HAN Ying¹, WANG Yamei¹, DU Fengqin¹, ZHANG Jin¹, CAO Songyun²(1. Infection Control Office, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China; 2. Clinical Trial Agency Office, Baoding No.1 Hospital of TCM, Baoding 071000, China)Abstract: To provide scientific basis for the clinical rational use of antimicrobial agents, the trend of drug resistance rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the annual dosage of antimicrobial agents in the same period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 in a hospital were retrospectively investigated, the frequency of use was calculated, and the correlation between the antibiotics use density(AUD)and drug resistance rate of P. aeruginosa was analyzed. Analysis results show that the drug resistance rate of P. aeruginosa to piperacillin/tazobactam, gentamicin, cefoperazone/sulbactam, cefoperazone, cefepime, imipenem- 收稿日期:2020-07-16 基金项目:河北大学附属医院青年科研资金资助项目(2016Q013) 第一作者:张新颖(1984—),女,河北保定人,河北大学附属医院主治医师,主要从事医院感染控制研究.E-mail:hdfyzxy@163.com 通信作者:曹松云(1986—),女,河北望都人,保定市第一中医院主管中药师,主要从事药物临床试验研究.E-mail:songyuncao@163.com第2期张新颖等:铜绿假单胞菌耐药性与抗菌药物使用强度相关性分析cisstatine, aztreonam, amikacin, netilmicin and levofloxacin showed a decreasing trend. Carbapenems and third-generation cephalosporins showed significant increases in AUD(P<0.05), cefepime and macrolides showed significant decreases in AUD(P<0.05), while piperacillin/tazobactam, aminoglycosides, quinolones and monocyclic β-lactams showed no significant changes in AUD(P>0.05). The AUD of carbapenem and third-generation cephalosporins was positively correlated with the drug resistance rate of P. aeruginosa(r=0.523, 0.605, P<0.05), piperacillin/tazobactam, monocyclic β-lactams, quinolones, macrolides, aminoglycosides, fourth-generation cephalosporins were not correlated with the drug resistance rate of P. aeruginosa(r=0.012~0.136, P>0.05). Our study demonstrates that from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019, the drug resistance rate of P. aeruginosa in hospital was well controlled, and the drug resistance rate of P. aeruginosa was related to the AUD. Clinical attention should be paid on the management of antibiotics to reduce the generation of bacterial resistance and its threat to human health.

Key words: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, drug resistance, antimicrobial agents, antibiotics use density

中图分类号:

R96
R446.5

张新颖,韩颖,王雅妹,杜凤芹,张晋,曹松云. 铜绿假单胞菌耐药性与抗菌药物使用强度相关性分析[J]. 河北大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(2): 188-194.

ZHANG Xinying, HAN Ying, WANG Yamei, DU Fengqin, ZHANG Jin, CAO Songyun. Analysis of the correlation between drug resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and antibiotics use density[J]. Journal of Hebei University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 41(2): 188-194.

参考文献

[1] 张祎博,孙景勇,倪语星,等.2005—2014年CHINET铜绿假单胞菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2016,16(2):141-145.DOI:10.16718/j.1009-7708.2016.02.005.
[2] 曾为伦,吴海鸥,章如玲,等.多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌的相关耐药机制研究[J].中国抗生素杂志,2016,41(5):377-381. DOI:10.13461/j.cnki.cja.005728.
[3] VESTERGAARD M, PAULANDER W, MARVIG R L, et al. Antibiotic combination therapy can select for broad-spectrum multidrug resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2016, 47(1): 48-55. DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.09.014.
[4] FERNÁNDEZ-BARAT L, FERRER M, DE ROSA F, et al. Intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa with and without multidrug resistance[J]. J Infect, 2017, 74(2): 142-152. DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2016.11.008.
[5] LABARCA J A, SALLES M J C, SEAS C, et al. Carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in the nosocomial setting in Latin America[J]. Crit Rev Microbiol, 2016, 42(2): 276-292. DOI:10.3109/1040841X.2014.940494.
[6] 付滢舟,杨立平,谌赟,等.我院铜绿假单胞菌耐药性与抗菌药物使用强度相关性分析[J].中国药房,2017,28(5): 607-610. DOI:10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2017.05.08.
[7] 中华人民共和国卫生部.医院感染诊断标准(试行)(卫医发[2001] 2号)[M].北京:人民出版社,2001:98.
[8] 杨利,赵小洁,李宝琴,等.两种方法评定D-二聚体实验室内测量复现性[J].重庆医学,2016,45(19):2678-2680. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2016.19.028.
[9] GUO Q, WEI Y, XIA B, et al. Identification of a small molecule that simultaneously suppresses virulence and antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 19141. DOI:10.1038/srep19141.
[10] 王玉香,曹彤,周晋, 等.2016—2018年南京市儿童医院铜绿假单胞菌的分布及耐药性分析[J].现代药物与临床,2019,34(8): 2549-2553. DOI:10.7501/j.issn.1674-5515.2019.08.064.
[11] 谢朝云,蒙桂鸾,覃家露,等.耐多药铜绿假单胞菌感染临床特征及相关因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2018,28(11): 1617-1620. DOI:10.11816/cn.ni.2018-180915.
[12] 王玉婷,徐红日,赵世同,等.扶正解毒化瘀方对多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌MexAB-OprM外排泵表达影响的研究[J].世界中医药,2019,14(4): 859-863. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2019.04.014.
[13] 中华人民共和国卫生部.多重耐药菌医院感染预防与控制技术指南(试行)[J].中国危重病急救医学,2011,23(2): 65.
[14] KHAN M A, FAIZ A. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in tertiary care hospitals of Makkah and Jeddah[J]. Ann Saudi Med, 2016, 36(1): 23-28. DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2016.23.
[15] JEUKENS J, KUKAVICA-IBRULJ I, EMOND-RHEAULT J G, et al. Comparative genomics of a drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa panel and the challenges of antimicrobial resistance prediction from genomes[J]. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2017, 364(18): fnx161. DOI:10.1093/femsle/fnx161.
[16] GERMONI L A P, BREMER P J, LAMONT I L. The effect of alginate lyase on the gentamicin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in mucoid biofilms[J]. J Appl Microbiol, 2016, 121(1): 126-135. DOI:10.1111/jam.13153.
[17] HASHEM H, HANORA A, ABDALLA S, et al. Carbapenem susceptibility and multidrug-resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in Egypt[J]. Jundishapur J Microbiol, 2016, 9(11): e30257. DOI:10.5812/jjm.30257.
[18] SMITH D J, RAMSAY K A, YERKOVICH S T, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotic resistance in Australian cystic fibrosis centres[J]. Respirology, 2016, 21(2): 329-337. DOI:10.1111/resp.12714.
[19] 刘春林,陈弟,徐红云,等.临床常见革兰阴性杆菌对三种碳青霉烯类抗菌药物的耐药性分析[J].医学检验与临床,2019,30(4): 19-23. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5013.2019.04.006.
[20] 余斌,解雪峰,杨婷,等.某三甲医院铜绿假单胞菌耐药性与抗菌药物使用强度的相关性研究[J].中国医院药学杂志,2019,39(5):521-524. DOI:10.13286/j.cnki.chinhosppharmacyj.2019.05.19.
[21] 王春雷,刘颖梅,黎斌斌,等.北京朝阳医院2008—2013年血培养阳性结果分析[J].中国实用内科杂志,2016,36(S1):22-26. DOI:10.7504/nk2016S10201.
[22] 王晶,马娟,范云,等.2015—2017年陕西省人民医院临床血流感染病原菌的分布及耐药性分析[J].现代检验医学杂志, 2019,34(4): 87-90,95. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2019.04.021.
[23] EBER M R, SHARDELL M, SCHWEIZER M L, et al. Seasonal and temperature-associated increases in gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections among hospitalized patients[J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(9): e25298. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0025298.
[24] CARMELI Y, TROILLET N, ELIOPOULOS G M, et al. Emergence of antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of risks associated with different antipseudomonal agents[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1999, 43(6): 1379-1382. DOI:10.1128/aac.43.6.1379.
[25] 周芳,王丽红,孙晓茜,等.铜绿假单胞菌耐药性与抗菌药物使用强度的相关性分析[J].中国现代医药杂志,2020,22(3): 45-48. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9463.2020.03.011.
[26] 黄支密,单浩,郭满盈,等.多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌耐药基因及亲缘性分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(4): 366-369. DOI:10.3321/j.issn: 1005-4529.2007.04.002.
[27] CALANDRA G, RICCI F, WANG C, et al. Cross-resistance and imipenem[J]. Lancet, 1986, 328(8502): 340-341. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90027-9.
[28] MOORE N M, FLAWS M L. Antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Clin Lab Sci, 2011, 24(1): 47-51.
[29] 王超,郭帅,郭佳亮,等.铜绿假单胞菌耐药率与抗菌药物使用情况的相关性分析[J]. 中国药业,2019,28(23): 78-81. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4931.2019.23.025.
[30] GATES M L, SANDERS C C, GOERING R V, et al. Evidence for multiple forms of type I chromosomal beta-lactamase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1986, 30(3): 453-457. DOI:10.1128/aac.30.3.453.
[31] 郭仲辉,黎毓光,卓超.抗生素压力下铜绿假单胞菌耐药机制变化的动态研究[J].中国抗生素杂志,2010,35(9):715-720. DOI:10.1346/j.cnki.cja.004649. (