荧光法检测根际土壤胞外酶活性的优化

  • 唐连发 ,
  • 王琴 ,
  • 唐兆鑫 ,
  • 杨晴晴
展开
唐连发(1997—),男,河北邢台人,河北大学硕士研究生,主要从事臭氧污染的生态效应研究.
E-mail:iphone2058@hotmail.com

收稿日期: 2022-03-24

  网络出版日期: 2023-02-22

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFE0127700)

Optimization of fluorescence detection of extracellular enzyme activities in rhizosphere soil

  • TANG Lianfa ,
  • WANG Qin ,
  • TANG Zhaoxin ,
  • YANG Qingqing
Expand
  • School of Eco-Environment(Preparatory), Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China

Received date: 2022-03-24

  Online published: 2023-02-22

摘要

为准确测定土壤胞外酶活性,对β-葡萄糖苷酶(βG)、纤维二糖水解酶(CBH)、β-N-乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)和亮氨酸氨基肽酶(LAP)、碱性磷酸酶(AKP)5种有关C、N、P循环的关键酶的荧光法测定进行了优化.结果发现,使用Cytation5等高灵敏度的酶标仪测定时水土比值应高于300∶1(mL∶g).5种胞外酶活性的最佳测定参数为:AKP、βG用超纯水作缓冲溶液,XH-C漩涡混匀器(60 W)混匀土壤5 min,25 ℃培养4 h;CBH用乙酸钠(0.2 mol/L,pH 5.8)作缓冲溶液,XH-C漩涡混匀器(60 W)混匀土壤5 min,25 ℃培养2 h;NAG用乙酸钠(0.2 mol/L,pH 5.8)作缓冲溶液,摇床(150 r/min)混匀60 min,25 ℃培养3 h;LAP用超纯水作缓冲溶液,摇床(150 r/min)混匀60 min,25 ℃培养1 h.本研究结论可为提高荧光法准确测定土壤胞外酶活性提供依据.

本文引用格式

唐连发 , 王琴 , 唐兆鑫 , 杨晴晴 . 荧光法检测根际土壤胞外酶活性的优化[J]. 河北大学学报(自然科学版), 2022 , 42(6) : 642 -649 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2022.06.012

Abstract

In order to accurately determine rhizosphere soil extracellular enzyme activities, five key enzymes related to the C, N, and P circulation including β-glucosidase(βG), cellobiohydrolase(CBH), β-N-acetylglucosaminidase(NAG), leucine aminopeptidase(LAP), and alkaline phosphatase(AKP)were optimized by fluorescence method. The results showed that the ratio of water to soil should be higher than 300∶1(mL∶g)when using a highly sensitive microplate reader such as Cytation5. The optimal parameters for determining the activities of five extracellular enzymes were as follows: AKP and βG were used with ultrapure water as buffer solution, the soil was mixed with an XH-C vortex mixer(60 W)for 5 min, and incubated at 25 ℃ for 4 h; CBH was used with sodium acetate(0.2 mol/L, pH 5.8)as buffer solution, the soil was mixed with an XH-C vortex mixer(60 W)for 5 min, and incubated at 25 ℃ for 2 h; NAG was used with sodium acetate(0.2 mol/L, pH 5.8)as buffer solution in a shaker(150 r/min)for 60 min, and incubated at 25 ℃ for 3 h; LAP was used with ultrapure water as buffer solution in a shaker(150 r/min)for 60 min, and incubated at 25 ℃ for 1 h. The results of this study can provide a basis for improving the accurate determination of soil extracellular enzyme activities by fluorescence method.

参考文献

[1] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社, 1986.
[2] 刘璐.喀斯特典型生态系统土壤胞外酶活性及其影响因素[D].桂林:广西师范大学, 2017.
[3] KISS S, DRÃGAN-BULARDA M, RÃDULESCU D. Biological significance of enzymes accumulated in soil[J]. Adv Agron, 1975, 27: 25-87. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)70007-5.
[4] DORAN J W, COLEMAN D C, BEZDICEK D F, et al. Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994, 58: 107-124. DOI: 10.2136/sssaspecpub35.c7.
[5] 陈雅涵,谢宗强.保存过程对土壤生化指标的影响及保存土样的应用[J].土壤学报, 2018, 55(4): 783-796. DOI: 10.11766/trxb201711270354.
[6] 田瑞.温带草原土壤胞外酶活性对氮沉降和降水变化的响应[D].开封:河南大学, 2020. DOI: 10.27114/d.cnki.ghnau.2020.001132.
[7] 部金凤,邹敬东,张心昱,等.不同荧光校正方法对土壤水解酶活性测定结果影响的比较研究[J].土壤通报, 2014, 45(3): 660-665. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2014.03.025.
[8] 贾淑娴,康晓慧,郭剑芬,等.响应曲面分析法优化常用水解酶荧光测试法研究[J].亚热带资源与环境学报, 2019, 14(4): 36-42, 62. DOI: 10.19687/j.cnki.1673-7105.2019.04.006.
[9] 孙思怡,卢胜旭,陆宇明,等.杉木林下套种阔叶树对土壤生态酶活性及其化学计量比的影响[J].林业科学研究, 2021, 34(1): 106-113. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2021.01.013.
[10] 徐文娴,李金秋,孟磊,等.葛藤覆盖对幼龄橡胶园表层土壤理化性状和酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(9): 1740-1748.
[11] VERCHOT L V, BORELLI T. Application of para-nitrophenol(pNP)enzyme assays in degraded tropical soils[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2005, 37(4): 625-633. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.005.
[12] 李啸灵,林伟盛,贾淑娴,等.不同处理采伐剩余物对营造杉木幼林土壤胞外酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1): 348-355. DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.050.
[13] TURNER B L, HOPKINS D W, HAYGARTH P M, et al. Β-Glucosidase activity in pasture soils[J]. Appl Soil Ecol, 2002, 20(2): 157-162. DOI: 10.1016/S0929-1393(02)00020-3.
[14] OLANDER L P, VITOUSEK P M. Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activity by N and P availability[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2000, 49(2): 175-190. DOI:10.1023/A:1006316117817.
[15] BURKE D J, WEINTRAUB M N, HEWINS C R, et al. Relationship between soil enzyme activities, nutrient cycling and soil fungal communities in a northern hardwood forest[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43(4): 795-803. DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.12.014.
[16] ALLISON V J, CONDRON L M, PELTZER D A, et al. Changes in enzyme activities and soil microbial community composition along carbon and nutrient gradients at the Franz Josef chronosequence, New Zealand[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2007, 39(7): 1770-1781. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.02.006.
[17] 胡慧蓉,田昆.土壤学实验指导教程[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 2012.
[18] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[19] SAIYA-CORK K R, SINSABAUGH R L, ZAK D R. The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2002, 34(9): 1309-1315. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00074-3.
[20] MARX M C, WOOD M, JARVIS S C. A microplate fluorimetric assay for the study of enzyme diversity in soils[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2001, 33(12/13): 1633-1640. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00079-7.
[21] Soil quality-Measurementof enzyme activity patterns insoil samples using fluorogenicsubstrates in micro-well plates[S]. Published in Switzerland, ISO/TS 22939, 2010(E)
[22] WANG J Y, HAYES F, TURNER R, et al. Effects of four years of elevated ozone on microbial biomass and extracellular enzyme activities in a semi-natural grassland[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 660: 260-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.040.
[23] 王冰冰,曲来叶,马克明,等.岷江上游干旱河谷优势灌丛群落土壤生态酶化学计量特征[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(18): 6078-6088. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201401270202.
[24] BROCKETT B F T, PRESCOTT C E, GRAYSTON S J. Soil moisture is the major factor influencing microbial community structure and enzyme activities across seven biogeoclimatic zones in western Canada[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2012, 44(1): 9-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.003.
[25] DEFOREST J L. The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and l-DOPA[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2009, 41(6): 1180-1186. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.029.
[26] 杜璨.秦岭辛家山不同林分土壤微生物群落的季节动态[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2018.
[27] 崔继文,徐新朋,何萍,等.氮素有机替代对东北黑土区土壤微生物碳磷资源限制的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(11): 1953-1966. DOI:10.11674/zwyf.20317.
[28] 殷陶刚,李玉泽.土壤酶活性影响因素及测定方法的研究进展[J].矿产勘查, 2019, 10(6): 1523-1528. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7801.2019.06.033.
[29] 梅孔灿,程蕾,张秋芳,等.不同植物来源可溶性有机质对亚热带森林土壤酶活性的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2020, 44(12): 1273-1284. DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2020.0097.
[30] 李欢,魏雅丽,闫帮国,等.元谋干热河谷沟蚀地区植被恢复对土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报, 2020, 51(5): 1118-1126. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2020.05.15.
[31] 徐国庆.污泥生物炭输入暖温带人工杨树林的土壤环境效应研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学, 2019. (
文章导航

/

〈 〉