为了解大清河流域河流生态健康状况,2023年5月和9月对河流的大型底栖动物开展监测研究,采用大型底栖动物生物完整性指数(benthic index of biological integrity,B-IBI)对河流健康状况进行评价.通过判别能力、分布范围和相关性分析对22个参数初筛,最终筛选出评价体系的主要指标,包括总分类单元数量、EPT分类单元数量、端足目+软体动物个体相对丰度、生物指数(BI)、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数和捕食者个体相对丰度.根据比值法,以参考点B-IBI值的25%分位数,确定大清河流域河流健康评价标准.调查结果表明,大清河流域河流共鉴定到大型底栖动物158个分类单元,包含软体动物门24种,环节动物门9种,节肢动物门125种.方形环棱螺(Bellamya purificata)、纹沼螺(Parafossarulus striatulus)、小云多足摇蚊(Polypedilium nubeculosum)、中华齿米虾(Caridina denticulata sinensis)为流域内的优势种.大型底栖动物完整性指数评价结果显示,河流健康状况总体呈现中等状态.67个采样点中,6个为健康,25个为良好,20个为中等,15个为较差,1个为很差.与2018年相比,大清河流域河流健康状况有所改善.
In order to understand the ecological health status of rivers in the Daqinghe Basin, monitoring and research were conducted of benthic animals in May and September 2023.The benthic index of biological integrity(B-IBI)was selected to evaluate the health status of rivers in the Daqinghe Basin. After preliminary screening of 22 parameters through discriminant ability, distribution range, and correlation- DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2025.06.010基于大型底栖动物生物完整性指数的大清河流域河流健康评价王菲1,周绪申2,赵燕楚2,孙博闻3, 周旌1(1.河北省生态环境监测中心,河北 石家庄 050037;2.生态环境部 海河流域北海海域生态环境监测与科学研究中心,天津 300170;3.水利工程智能建设与运维全国重点实验室,天津 300072)摘 要:为了解大清河流域河流生态健康状况,2023年5月和9月对河流的大型底栖动物开展监测研究,采用大型底栖动物生物完整性指数(benthic index of biological integrity,B-IBI)对河流健康状况进行评价.通过判别能力、分布范围和相关性分析对22个参数初筛,最终筛选出评价体系的主要指标,包括总分类单元数量、EPT分类单元数量、端足目+软体动物个体相对丰度、生物指数(BI)、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数和捕食者个体相对丰度.根据比值法,以参考点B-IBI值的25%分位数,确定大清河流域河流健康评价标准.调查结果表明,大清河流域河流共鉴定到大型底栖动物158个分类单元,包含软体动物门24种,环节动物门9种,节肢动物门125种.方形环棱螺(Bellamya purificata)、纹沼螺(Parafossarulus striatulus)、小云多足摇蚊(Polypedilium nubeculosum)、中华齿米虾(Caridina denticulata sinensis)为流域内的优势种.大型底栖动物完整性指数评价结果显示,河流健康状况总体呈现中等状态.67个采样点中,6个为健康,25个为良好,20个为中等,15个为较差,1个为很差.与2018年相比,大清河流域河流健康状况有所改善.关键词:大清河流域;河流健康评价;大型底栖动物;生物完整性指数中图分类号:Q89 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1000-1565(2025)06-0644-09River health assessment of the Daqinghe Basin based on benthic index of biological integrityWANG Fei1, ZHOU Xushen2, ZHAO Yanchu2, SUN Bowen3, ZHOU Jing1(1. Ecological Environment Monitoring Center of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050037, China; 2. Ecological Environment Monitoring and Scientific Research Center of Haihe River Basin and Beihai Sea Area, Ministry of Ecological Environment, Tianjin 300170, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation, Tianjin 300072, China)Abstract: In order to understand the ecological health status of rivers in the Daqinghe Basin, monitoring and research were conducted of benthic animals in May and September 2023.The benthic index of biological integrity(B-IBI)was selected to evaluate the health status of rivers in the Daqinghe Basin. After preliminary screening of 22 parameters through discriminant ability, distribution range, and correlation- 收稿日期:2024-08-21;修回日期:2024-11-06 基金项目:水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室“一带一路”水与可持续发展科技基金项目(2021nkms04);河北省白洋淀流域水生态监测项目(ZC-467004-2024003) 第一作者:王菲(1982—),男,河北省生态环境监测中心高级工程师,博士,主要从事生态质量监测与评价方向研究.E-mail:we.fei@qq.com 通信作者:赵燕楚(1992—),女,生态环境部高级工程师,博士,主要从事水生态监测与评价方向研究.E-mail: z18306421151@163.com 第6期王菲等:基于大型底栖动物生物完整性指数的大清河流域河流健康评价河北大学学报(自然科学版) 第45卷analysis, the main indicators of the evaluation system were ultimately selected, including the number of total taxonomic units, EPT taxonomic units, relative abundance of cephalopods and mollusks, biological index(BI), Shannon-Wiener diversity index, and relative abundance of predator individuals. According to the ratio method, the 25% percentile of the reference point B-IBI value is used to determine the river health evaluation criteria for the Daqinghe Basin. The survey results indicate that a total of 158 taxonomic units of large benthic animals have been identified in the Daqinghe Basin, including 24 species of mollusks, 9 species of annelids, and 125 species of arthropods. The dominant species in the watershed are Bellamya purifica, Parafossarulus striatulus, Polypedium nubeculosum, and Caridina denticulata sinensis. The evaluation results of the integrity index of large benthic animals show that the river is generally in a moderate state. Among the 67 sampling points, 6 are healthy, 25 are good, 20 are moderate, 15 are poor, and 1 is very poor. Compared to 2018, the health status of rivers in the Daqinghe Basin has improved.
[1] KARR J R. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities[J]. Fisheries, 1981, 6(6): 21-27. DOI:10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021: AOBIUF>2.0.CO;2.
[2] 王瑜,李黎,林岿璇,等.松花江流域大型底栖动物生物完整性指数构建及其适用性[J].中国环境监测, 2019, 35(4): 20-30. DOI:10.19316/j.issn.1002-6002.2019.04.03.
[3] 殷旭旺,张远,渠晓东,等.浑河水系着生藻类的群落结构与生物完整性[J].应用生态学报, 2011, 22(10): 2732-2740. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2011.0391.
[4] 蔡琨,秦春燕,李继影,等.基于浮游植物生物完整性指数的湖泊生态系统评价: 以2012年冬季太湖为例[J].生态学报, 2016, 36(5): 1431-1441. DOI:10.5846/stxb201407211483.
[5] 沈强,俞建军,陈晖,等.浮游生物完整性指数在浙江水源地水质评价中的应用[J].水生态学杂志, 2012, 33(2): 26-31. DOI:10.15928/j.1674-3075.2012.02.013.
[6] 夏会娟,孔维静,王汩,等.北京市北运河水系水生植物群落结构与生物完整性[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(2): 260-268. DOI:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.06027.
[7] WEIGEL B M, HENNE L J, MARTÍNEZ-RIVERA L M. Macroinvertebrate-based index of biotic integrity for protection of streams in west-central Mexico[J]. J N Am N Benthol Soc, 2002, 21(4): 686-700.
[8] ZHANG Y, ZHAO R, KONG W J, et al. Relationships between macroinvertebrate communities and land use types within different riparian widths in three headwater streams of Taizi River, China[J]. J Freshw Ecol, 2013, 28(3): 307-328. DOI:10.1080/02705060.2013.779941.
[9] 殷旭旺,渠晓东,李庆南,等.基于着生藻类的太子河流域水生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报, 2012, 32(6): 1677-1691. DOI:10.5846/stxb201102090159.
[10] 张远,徐成斌,马溪平,等.辽河流域河流底栖动物完整性评价指标与标准[J].环境科学学报, 2007,27(6): 919-927. DOI:10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2007.06.005.
[11] HEINO J, MUOTKA T, MYKRÄ H, et al. Defining macroinvertebrate assemblage types of headwater streams: Implications for bioassessment and conservation[J]. Ecol Appl, 2003, 13(3): 842-852. DOI:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0842: DMATOH] 2.0.CO;2.
[12] ROSI-MARSHALL E J, WALLACE J B. Invertebrate food webs along a stream resource gradient[J].Freshw Biol, 2002, 47(1): 129-141. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00786.x.
[13] 马思琦,杨柏贺,王汨,等.基于底栖动物生物完整性指数B-IBI的济南地区水体健康评价[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 16(11): 107-111. DOI:10.16772/j.cnki.1673-1409.2019.11.022.
[14] CHIS Y, GONG Y T, WANG H J, et al. A pilot macroinvertebrate-based multimetric index(MMI-CS)for assessing the ecological status of the Chishui River basin, China[J]. Ecol Indic, 2017, 83: 84-95. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.045.
[15] HELSON J E, WILLIAMS D D. Development of a macroinvertebrate multimetric index for the assessment of low-land streams in the neotropics[J]. Ecol Indic, 2013, 29: 167-178. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.030.
[16] KERANS B L, KARR J R. A benthic index of biotic integrity(B-IBI)for rivers of the Tennessee valley[J]. Ecol Appl, 1994, 4(4): 768-785. DOI:10.2307/1942007.
[17] MORLEY S A, KARR J R. Assessing and restoring the health of urban streams in the puget sound basin[J]. Conserv Biol, 2002, 16(6): 1498-1509. DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01067.x.
[18] 王备新.大型底栖无脊椎动物水质生物评价研究[D].南京: 南京农业大学, 2003.
[19] 张远,徐成斌,马溪平,等.辽河流域河流底栖动物完整性评价指标与标准[J].环境科学学报, 2007,27(6): 919-927. DOI:10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2007.06.005.
[20] 张颖,胡金,万云,等.基于底栖动物完整性指数B-IBI的淮河流域水系生态健康评价[J].生态与农村环境学报, 2014, 30(3): 300-305. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4831.2014.03.005.
[21] 付岚,江源,刘琦,等.基于大型底栖动物完整性指数B-IBI的东江流域水生态健康评价[J].生态环境学报, 2018, 27(8): 1502-1511. DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2018.08.017.
[22] 黄彬彬,李光锦,丰茂成,等.基于底栖动物生物完整性指数的赣江干流健康评价[J].水资源与水工程学报, 2020, 31(5): 30-36. DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2020.05.05.
[23] 张宇航,渠晓东,王少明,等.浑河流域底栖动物生物完整性指数构建与健康评价[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(6): 1374-1386. DOI:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202006012.
[24] 赵燕楚,王菲,吴丹,等.海河流域河流大型底栖动物生物完整性指数健康评价[J].生态环境学报, 2023, 32(10): 1785-1793. DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.10.007.
[25] 王艳芳,叶凯敏,申彦科.大清河流域生态保护现状及对策建议[J].海河水利, 2024(4): 20-23. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-7328.2024.04.005.
[26] 司马文卉,胡小凤,沈占峰,等.大清河流域水生态安全评价指标体系构建[J].给水排水, 2021, 57(1): 90-95. DOI:10.13789/j.cnki.wwe1964.2021.01.018.
[27] 齐静,穆冬靖.大清河水生态系统恢复探讨[C] //2022中国水利学术大会论文集:第2分册.北京, 2022: 492-495. DOI:10.26914/c.cnkihy.2022.057478.
[28] 许维,梁舒汀,黄艳凤,等.基于大型底栖动物的大清河水系水体健康状况评价[J].湿地科学,2020, 18(5): 546-554.DOI: 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2020.05.006.
[29] 刘月英.中国经济动物志-淡水软体动物[M].北京: 科学出版社, 1979.
[30] MORSE E B J C, YANG L F, TIAN L X. Aquatic insects of china useful for monitoring water quality[M]. Nanjing: Hohai University Press, 1994.
[31] 王俊才,王新华.中国北方摇蚊幼虫[M].北京:中国言实出版社, 2011.
[32] MCNAUGHTON S J. Relationships among functional properties of Californian grassland[J]. Nature, 1967, 216(5111): 168-169. DOI:10.1038/216168b0.
[33] ASTIN L E. Data synthesis and bioindicator development for nontidal streams in the interstate Potomac River basin, USA[J].Ecol Indic,2006, 6(4): 664-685. DOI: 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2005.08.030.
[34] BURTON J, GERRITSEN J. A stream condition index for Virginia non-coastal streams[J].Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Richmond, Virginia, USA,2003, 163.
[35] GERRITSEN J, CARLSON R, DYCUS D, et al. Lake and reservoir bioassessment and biocriteria: Technical guidance document[M].Washington: U'. SEPA Office of Water,1998.
[36] 张宇航,颜旭,姜兵琦,等.应用底栖动物完整性指数评价北京市河流水生态环境质量 [J].湖泊科学,2023, 35(6): 2010-2022. DOI:10.18307/2023.0628.
[37] 熊春晖,张瑞雷,徐玉萍,等.应用底栖动物完整性指数评价上海市河流健康[J].湖泊科学,2015, 27(6): 1067-1078. DOI: 10.18307/2015.0611. (
