电极结构对电流体运动的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2023.03.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究电极结构的变化对除尘器中电晕放电产生的二次流与主流一次流耦合后形成的流场以及电场分布的影响,设计了线-传统板与2种不同结构的线-开孔板极配方式.在建立电晕放电和流场的多物理场耦合数值模型的基础上,利用COMSOL软件模拟研究了3种不同极配方式下的电除尘器通道内的电场与流场特征.模拟结果表明:电极结构对除尘器内部近板电场及流场分布影响较大.新型开孔板的近板电场强度高于传统板,随着入口流速的增大,离子风对除尘器通道内流场的扰动逐渐减小.结果同时表明孔结构能有效降低近收尘极板流速,在入口流速为0.5 m/s时,新型开孔板近板风速相比传统板分别降低了14.58%和15.62%,入口流速为1.0 m/s时,近板流速分别降低了19.94%和20.20%.这一结果表明新型开孔结构能有效减小收尘极板附近流速,减少二次扬尘,提高除尘效率.

关键词: 电晕放电, 静电除尘, 电极结构, 离子风, 数值模拟

Abstract: In order to study the influence of electrode structure change on the flow field and electric field distribution of dust collector after the secondary current generated by corona discharge is coupled with the primary current, the pole matching mode of wire traditional plate and wire perforated plate with two different structures is designed. On the basis of establishing the multi physical field coupling numerical model of corona discharge and flow field, the characteristics of electric field and flow field in the channel of electrostatic precipitator under three different pole matching modes are simulated and studied by COMSOL software. The simulation results show that the electrode structure has a great influence on the distribution of electric field and flow field near the plate in the dust collector. The near plate electric field intensity of the new perforated plate is higher than that of the traditional plate. With the increase of inlet velocity, the disturbance of ion wind on the flow field in the dust collector channel gradually decreases. The results also show that the orifice structure can effectively reduce the velocity near the dust collector plate. When the- DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2023.03.004电极结构对电流体运动的影响武磊,郭朋朋,陈旭东, 李庆(河北大学物理科学与技术学院,河北保定 071002)摘要:为了研究电极结构的变化对除尘器中电晕放电产生的二次流与主流一次流耦合后形成的流场以及电场分布的影响,设计了线-传统板与2种不同结构的线-开孔板极配方式.在建立电晕放电和流场的多物理场耦合数值模型的基础上,利用COMSOL软件模拟研究了3种不同极配方式下的电除尘器通道内的电场与流场特征.模拟结果表明:电极结构对除尘器内部近板电场及流场分布影响较大.新型开孔板的近板电场强度高于传统板,随着入口流速的增大,离子风对除尘器通道内流场的扰动逐渐减小.结果同时表明孔结构能有效降低近收尘极板流速,在入口流速为0.5 m/s时,新型开孔板近板风速相比传统板分别降低了14.58%和15.62%,入口流速为1.0 m/s时,近板流速分别降低了19.94%和20.20%.这一结果表明新型开孔结构能有效减小收尘极板附近流速,减少二次扬尘,提高除尘效率.关键词:电晕放电;静电除尘;电极结构;离子风;数值模拟中图分类号:X513 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1000-1565(2023)03-0248-09Influence of electrode structure on electrofluid motionWU Lei, GUO Pengpeng, CHEN Xudong, LI Qing(College of Physics Science and Technology, Hebei University, Baoding 071002,China)Abstract: In order to study the influence of electrode structure change on the flow field and electric field distribution of dust collector after the secondary current generated by corona discharge is coupled with the primary current, the pole matching mode of wire traditional plate and wire perforated plate with two different structures is designed. On the basis of establishing the multi physical field coupling numerical model of corona discharge and flow field, the characteristics of electric field and flow field in the channel of electrostatic precipitator under three different pole matching modes are simulated and studied by COMSOL software. The simulation results show that the electrode structure has a great influence on the distribution of electric field and flow field near the plate in the dust collector. The near plate electric field intensity of the new perforated plate is higher than that of the traditional plate. With the increase of inlet velocity, the disturbance of ion wind on the flow field in the dust collector channel gradually decreases. The results also show that the orifice structure can effectively reduce the velocity near the dust collector plate. When the- 收稿日期:2022-08-25 基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51777051);河北省高等学校科学技术研究项目(ZD2020197);河北省自然科学基金资助项目(E2022201057;E2021201037;G2020201001) 第一作者:武磊(1997—),男,湖北荆州人,河北大学在读硕士研究生,主要从事大气污染监测与控制方面研究.E-mail:wuleistone123@163.com 通信作者:李庆(1968—),男,安徽合肥人,河北大学研究员,博士生导师,主要从事高电压技术的应用与大气污染控制技术的开发与应用.E-mail:liqinghbu@126.com第3期武磊等:电极结构对电流体运动的影响inlet velocity is 0.5 m/s, the velocity near the plate of the new orifice plate is reduced by 14.58% and 15.62%, respectively, compared with the traditional plate. When the inlet velocity is 1.0 m/s, the velocity near the plate is reduced by 19.94% and 20.20% respectively. The results show that the new opening structure can effectively reduce the flow velocity near the dust collector plate, reduce the secondary dust, and improve the dust removal efficiency.

Key words: corona discharge, electrostatic precipitator, electrode structure, ion wind, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

X513

武磊,郭朋朋,陈旭东, 李庆. 电极结构对电流体运动的影响[J]. 河北大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 43(3): 248-256.

WU Lei, GUO Pengpeng, CHEN Xudong, LI Qing. Influence of electrode structure on electrofluid motion[J]. Journal of Hebei University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 43(3): 248-256.

参考文献

[1] 翟美丹,米俊锋,马文鑫,等.静电除尘技术及其影响因素的发展现状[J].应用化工,2021,50(9): 2572-2577. DOI:10.16581/j.cnki.issn1671-3206.2021.09.040.
[2] 方梦祥,柳佳佳,岑建孟,等.高温静电除尘技术研究进展及应用前景[J].高电压技术,2019,45(4): 1108-1117. DOI:10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20190329011.
[3] 李庆,张文婷,侯雪超,等.静电除尘极配方式对烧结机头微细粉尘收集效率的影响分析[J].高电压技术, 2021,47(1):346-352. DOI:10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20191737.
[4] 吴剑.除尘系统中旋风除尘器与布袋除尘器的型式与配置[J].中国铸造装备与技术, 2020, 55(5): 5-9.
[5] CHEN Z T, XING F, JIAN L. Effect of charged water drop atomization on particle removal performance in plate type wet electrostatic precipitator[J]. J Electrostat, 2020, 104(C): 103426-103426. DOI:10.1016/j.elstat.2020.103426.
[6] 青宪,黄蓉,黄锦琼, 等.2种活性炭协同布袋除尘对垃圾焚烧厂烟气中二噁英的去除[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(3):1677-1682.
[7] WANG Y F, GAO W C, ZHANG H, et al. Insights into the role of ionic wind in honeycomb electro -static precipitators[J]. J Aerosol Sci, 2019, 133: 83-95. DOI:10.1016/ j.jaerosci.2019.04. 011.
[8] BACHER C, LEBEDYNSKYY V, FISCHER S, et al. Discharge electrode geometry and energy efficiency in a one-stage wire-tube electrostatic precipitator operating at high concentrations of submicron liquid aerosol [J]. Environ Technol, 2018. DOI:10.1080/09593330.2018.1555613.
[9] MARIA J, ARKADIUSZ S, RYSZARD T, et al. Experimental study of fly ash precipitation in a model electrostatic precipitator with discharge electrodes of different design[J]. Powder Technology, 2003, 135: 295-301. DOI:10.1016/j.powtec.2003.08.021.
[10] 沈欣军,曾宇翾,郑钦臻,等.基于粒子成像测速法的正、负电晕放电下线-板式电除尘器内流场测试[J].高电压技术, 2014,40(9):2757-2763. DOI:10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.2014.09.021.
[11] XU J J, CHEN P J, GU Z Z, et al. Performances of a new type high-temperature tubular electrostatic precipitator with rare-earth tungsten cathode[J]. Sep Purif Technol, 2022,280. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119820.
[12] JAWOREK A, MARCHEWICZ A, SOBCZYK A K, et al. Two-stage electrostatic precipitator with co- and counter-flow particle prechargers[J]. J Electrostat, 2017, 87: 180-194. DOI:10.1016/j.elstat. 2017.04.012.
[13] KAZUNORI T, HIROMU K, ATSUSHI K, et al. Two-stage electrostatic precipitator using induction charging[J]. J Phys D,2018,51(17):174002-174002. DOI:10.1088/1361-6463/aab4bf.
[14] 李凯,胡文斌,刘宇芳,等.一种串联对称式脉冲静电除尘电源研究[J].电力电子技术, 2021, 55(10): 50-53. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-100X.2021.10.015.
[15] 冯伟铭,刘文婧,林远劲,等.一种新型高效湿法静电除尘器[J].节能,2020,39(9):103-105. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7948.2020.09.036.
[16] 王宏伟,邵春娇.湍冲洗涤静电除尘技术在甲醇制烯烃装置的应用研究[J].石化技术,2020,27(4):1-3.
[17] WANG C, XIE Z Q, XU B G, et al. Experimental study on EHD flow transition in a small scale wire-plate ESP[J]. Meas Sci Rev, 2016, 16(3): 134141. DOI:10.1515/msr-2016-0016.
[18] NING Z Y,CHENG L, SHEN X J, et al. Electrode configurations inside an electrostatic precipitator and their impact on collection efficiency and flow pattern[J]. Eur Phys J D, 2016, 70(6):126. DOI:10.1140/epjd/e2016-60736-2.
[19] 柳林,顾晓奕,杨璇,等.扩缩板对静电除尘器颗粒脱除影响[J].常州大学学报,2021,33(6):43-50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0411.2021.06.007.
[20] 王伊凡,高文超,邵凌宇,等.离子风对静电除尘器中颗粒物脱除的影响机制研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2022,42(2):663-673. DOI:10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.211341.
[21] 李庆,剧晓晨,殷宇朝,等.孔板对微细粉尘收集效率研究[J].河北大学学报(自然科学版),2017,37(1):13-18. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2017.01.003.
[22] KASDI A. Computation and measurement of corona current density and V-I characteristics in wires - to-plates electrostatic precipitator[J]. J Electrostat, 2016, 81:1-8. DOI:10.1016/ j.elstat. 2016.02.005.
[23] TALAIE M R. Mathematical modeling of wire-duct single-stage electrostatic precipitators[J]. J Hazard Mater, 2005, 124(1/2/3):44-52. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.01.007.
[24] WHITE H J. Particle charging in electrostatic precipitation[J]. Trans Am Inst Electr Eng, 1951, 70(2): 1186-1191. DOI: 10.1109/t-aiee.1951.5060545.
[25] YAKHOT V, ORSZAG S A. Renormalization-group analysis of turbulence[J]. Phys Rev Lett, 1986, 57(14):1722-1724. DOI:10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.275.
[26] 沈欣军,王仕龙,韩平,等.电除尘器内亚微米细颗粒物动态的可视化测试[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2015,49(5):985-992. DOI:10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2015.05.025.
[27] 李庆,刘晓娃,剧晓晨,等.针-板电极负电晕放电下离子分布状态的影响因素[J].高电压技术,2017,43(5):1700-1706. DOI:10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20170428041. (