The investigation of metazoan zooplankton and water environment were operated from April 2019 to November 2019 in Beidaihe national wetland park, in order to analyze the temporal distribution of metazoan zooplankton functional groups and environmental driving factors. The results showed that a total of 95 species of metazoan zooplankton were identified. According to the size and feeding habits, 8 functional groups of metazoan zooplankton were identified. The functional groups are consisted with that small size metazoan zooplankton were dominant in the whole year in density and biomass. There were significant differences in the functional groups of metazoan zooplankton between spring and the other three seasons by analysis of similarities(ANOSIM)and non-metric multidimensional scaling(NMDS)in coastal freshwater wetland. The results showed that the driving factors of distribution of metazoan zooplankton functional groups had seasonal differences by the Mantel test, redundancy analysis(RDA)and partial least- DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2022.02.013北戴河国家湿地公园后生浮游动物功能群季节分布及影响因子周静1,肖国华2,武大勇3,王军霞1,刘存歧1(1.河北大学 生命科学学院,河北 保定 071002;2.河北省海洋生物资源与环境重点实验室,河北 秦皇岛 066200;3.衡水学院 河北省湿地生态与保护重点实验室,河北 衡水 053000)摘 要:2019年4月至11月在北戴河国家湿地公园进行后生浮游动物和水环境调查,以探究滨海淡水湿地后生浮游动物功能群的季节分布特征及影响因子.采用相似性分析(analysis of similarities,ANOSIM)、非度量多维尺度分析(non-metric multidimensional scaling,NMDS)、Mantel检验、冗余分析(redundancy analysis,RDA)及偏最小二乘路径模型(partial least squares-path modeling,Pls-pm)对后生浮游动物功能群和影响因子进行研究,调查期间共采集并鉴定后生浮游动物95种,共划分为8个功能群.结果显示,研究地后生浮游动物功能群组成春季与夏、秋、冬3季差异显著;小型个体组成的功能群在全年密度和生物量中均占优势;非营养盐类环境因子为后生浮游动物功能群季节演替主要驱动因子;营养盐类环境因子对后生浮游动物功能群季节演替影响较小.关键词:滨海淡水湿地;后生浮游动物;功能群;季节演替;驱动因子中图分类号:Q145 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1000-1565(2022)02-0190-09Temporal distribution of metazoan zooplankton functional groups and environmental driving factors in Beidaihe national wetland parkZHOU Jing1,XIAO Guohua2,WU Dayong3,WANG Junxia1,LIU Cunqi1(1. School of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China; 2. Hebei Key Laboratory of Marine Biological Resources and Environment, Qinhuangdao 066200, China; 3. Hebei Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Conservation, Hengshui University, Hengshui 053000, China)Abstract: The investigation of metazoan zooplankton and water environment were operated from April 2019 to November 2019 in Beidaihe national wetland park, in order to analyze the temporal distribution of metazoan zooplankton functional groups and environmental driving factors. The results showed that a total of 95 species of metazoan zooplankton were identified. According to the size and feeding habits, 8 functional groups of metazoan zooplankton were identified. The functional groups are consisted with that small size metazoan zooplankton were dominant in the whole year in density and biomass. There were significant differences in the functional groups of metazoan zooplankton between spring and the other three seasons by analysis of similarities(ANOSIM)and non-metric multidimensional scaling(NMDS)in coastal freshwater wetland. The results showed that the driving factors of distribution of metazoan zooplankton functional groups had seasonal differences by the Mantel test, redundancy analysis(RDA)and partial least- 收稿日期:2021-10-12 基金项目:生态环境部生物多样性调查评估项目(2019HJ2096001006);河北省重点研发计划项目(20373603D);河北省湿地生态与保护重点实验室开放基金资助项目(hklk202003) 第一作者:周静(1989—),女,天津人,河北大学在读硕士研究生,主要从事水生态研究. E-mail: 280972025@qq.com 通信作者:刘存歧(1967—),男,河北秦皇岛人,河北大学教授,博士,主要从事水生态研究. E-mail: liucunqi@sina.com王军霞(1974—),女,河北新乐人,河北大学副教授,主要从事水生态研究. E-mail: 303370613@qq.com第2期周静等:北戴河国家湿地公园后生浮游动物功能群季节分布及影响因子squares-path modeling(Pls-pm)in coastal freshwater wetland. The physical-chemical factors were the main driving factors for the seasonal succession of metazoan zooplankton functional groups. Nutrients had little effect on the seasonal succession of metazoan zooplankton functional groups.
[1] KUCZYN'SKA-KIPPEN N, NAGENGAST B. The impact of the spatial structure of hydromacrophytes on the similarity of rotifera communities(Budzyńskie Lake, Poland)[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2003, 506: 333-338. DOI:10.1023/B: HYDR.0000008542.76373.44.
[2] TELESH I V. Plankton of the Baltic estuarine ecosystems with emphasis on Neva Estuary: a review of present knowledge and research perspectives[J]. Mar Pollut Bull, 2004, 49(3): 206-219. DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.02.009.
[3] LEONI B. Zooplankton predators and prey: body size and stable isotope to investigate the pelagic food web in a deep lake(Lake Iseo, Northern Italy)[J]. J Limnol, 2017, 76(1): 85-93. DOI:10.4081/jlimnol.2016.1490.
[4] LIRA A, ANGELINI R, LE LOC'H F, et al. Trophic flow structure of a neotropical estuary in northeastern Brazil and the comparison of ecosystem model indicators of estuaries[J]. J Mar Syst, 2018, 182: 31-45. DOI:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2018.02.007.
[5] 陈非洲.关于淡水浮游动物和原生动物分开研究的建议[J].湖泊科学, 2016, 28(3): 691. DOI:10.18307/2016.0327.
[6] GOMES L F, PEREIRA H R, GOMES A C A M, et al. Zooplankton functional-approach studies in continental aquatic environments: a systematic review[J]. Aquat Ecol, 2019, 53(2): 191-203. DOI:10.1007/s10452-019-09682-8.
[7] VANDROMME P, STEMMANN L, GARCÌA-COMAS C, et al. Assessing biases in computing size spectra of automatically classified zooplankton from imaging systems: a case study with the ZooScan integrated system[J]. Methods Oceanogr, 2012, 1/2: 3-21. DOI:10.1016/j.mio.2012.06.001.
[8] MOLINERO J C, IBANEZ F, SOUISSI S, et al. Climate control on the long-term anomalous changes of zooplankton communities in the Northwestern Mediterranean[J]. Glob Chang Biol, 2008, 14(1): 11-26. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01469.x.
[9] DE PUELLES M L F, MOLINERO J C. Increasing zooplankton variance in the late 1990s unveils hydroclimate modifications in the Balearic Sea, Western Mediterranean[J]. Mar Environ Res, 2013, 86: 76-80. DOI:10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.12.011.
[10] ANDERSON T R. Plankton functional type modelling: running before we can walk?[J]. J Plankton Res, 2005, 27(11): 1073-1081. DOI:10.1093/plankt/fbi076.
[11] FALKOWSKI P G, BARBER R T, SMETACEK V. Biogeochemical controls and feedbacks on ocean primary production[J]. Science, 1998, 281(5374): 200-206. DOI:10.1126/science.281.5374.200.
[12] QUÉRÉ C L, HARRISON S P, COLIN P I, et al. Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry models[J]. Glob Chang Biol, 2005, 11(11): 2016-2040. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.1004.x.
[13] WAN MAZNAH W O, INTAN S, SHARIFAH R, et al. Lentic and lotic assemblages of zooplankton in a tropical reservoir, and their association with water quality conditions[J]. Int J Environ Sci Technol, 2018, 15(3): 533-542. DOI:10.1007/s13762-017-1412-1.
[14] TOUSSAINT A, CHARPIN N, BROSSE S, et al. Global functional diversity of freshwater fish is concentrated in the Neotropics while functional vulnerability is widespread[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 22125. DOI:10.1038/srep22125.
[15] REYNOLDS C S, ELLIOTT J A, FRASSL M A. Predictive utility of trait-separated phytoplankton groups: a robust approach to modeling population dynamics[J]. J Gt Lakes Res, 2014, 40: 143-150. DOI:10.1016/j.jglr.2014.02.005.
[16] WEIHER E, VAN DER WERF A, THOMPSON K, et al. Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology[J]. J Veg Sci, 1999, 10(5): 609-620. DOI:10.2307/3237076.
[17] WINEMILLER K O, FITZGERALD D B, BOWER L M, et al. Functional traits, convergent evolution, and periodic tables of niches[J]. Ecol Lett, 2015, 18(8): 737-751. DOI:10.1111/ele.12462.
[18] SANTOS J B O, SILVA L H S, BRANCO C W C, et al. The roles of environmental conditions and geographical distances on the species turnover of the whole phytoplankton and zooplankton communities and their subsets in tropical reservoirs[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2016, 764(1): 171-186. DOI:10.1007/s10750-015-2296-z.
[19] PORCEL S, CHAPARRO G, MARINONE M C, et al. The role of environmental, geographical, morphometric and spatial variables on plankton communities in lakes of the arid Patagonian plateaus[J]. J Plankton Res, 2020, 42(2): 173-187. DOI:10.1093/plankt/fbaa004.
[20] FINSTAD A G, NILSEN E B, HENDRICHSEN D K, et al. Catchment vegetation and temperature mediating trophic interactions and production in plankton communities[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(4): e0174904. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0174904.
[21] OERTLI B, PARRIS K M. Review: Toward management of urban ponds for freshwater biodiversity[J]. Ecosphere, 2019, 10(7): e02810. DOI:10.1002/ecs2.2810.
[22] JONIAK T, KUCZYN'SKA-KIPPEN N, GABKA M. Effect of agricultural landscape characteristics on the hydrobiota structure in small water bodies[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2017, 793(1): 121-133. DOI:10.1007/s10750-016-2913-5.
[23] NEWMAN S. Wetland ecology: principles and conservation, 2nd edition[J]. J Environ Qual, 2011, 40(4): 1345. DOI:10.2134/jeq2011.0005br.
[24] YANG W J, YOU Q H, FANG N, et al. Assessment of wetland health status of Poyang Lake using vegetation-based indices of biotic integrity[J]. Ecol Indic, 2018, 90: 79-89. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.056.
[25] 王维晴,周立志,陈薇,等.长江下游升金湖湿地保护有效性评价(1989—2019年)[J].湖泊科学, 2021, 33(3): 905-921. DOI:10.18307/2021.0324.
[26] 章宗涉,黄祥飞.淡水浮游生物研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社, 1991.
[27] 孔祥虹,肖兰兰,苏豪杰,等.长江下游湖泊水生植物现状及与水环境因子的关系[J].湖泊科学, 2015, 27(3): 385-391. DOI:10.18307/2015.0303.
[28] R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2020[Z/OL].[2021-02-28]. http://www. r-project. org, 2020.
[29] OKSANEN J, BLANCHET G, FRIENDLY M, et al.vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-7. 2020[Z/OL].[2021-02-25].https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
[30] SANCHEZ G,TRINCHERA L, RUSSOLILLO G. plspm: Tools for Partial Least Squares Path Modeling(PLS-PM). R package version 0.4.9.2017[Z/OL].[2021-02-20]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=plspm.
[31] 安睿,王凤友,于洪贤,等.三环泡湿地浮游动物功能群季节变化及其影响因子[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(6): 1851-1860. DOI:10.5846/stxb201510292184.
[32] LITCHMAN E, OHMAN M D, KIØRBOE T. Trait-based approaches to zooplankton communities[J]. J Plankton Res, 2013, 35(3): 473-484. DOI:10.1093/plankt/fbt019.
[33] RIZO E Z C, GU Y L, PAPA R D S, et al. Identifying functional groups and ecological roles of tropical and subtropical freshwater Cladocera in Asia[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2017, 799(1): 83-99. DOI:10.1007/s10750-017-3199-y.
[34] ORCUTT J D, PACE M L. Seasonal dynamics of rotifer and crustacean zooplankton populations in a eutrophic, monomictic lake with a note on rotifer sampling techniques[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1984, 119(1): 73-80. DOI:10.1007/BF00016866.
[35] OBERTEGGER U, FLAIM G, BRAIONI M G, et al. Water residence time as a driving force of zooplankton structure and succession[J]. Aquat Sci, 2007, 69(4): 575-583. DOI:10.1007/s00027-007-0924-z.
[36] HOLST H, ZIMMERMANN H, KAUSCH H, et al. Temporal and spatial dynamics of planktonic rotifers in the Elbe estuary during spring[J]. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci, 1998, 47(3): 261-273. DOI:10.1006/ecss.1998.0364.
[37] 王文侠,陈非洲,谷孝鸿.南京市5座中型水库浮游动物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系[J].湖泊科学, 2017, 29(1): 216-223. DOI:10.18307/2017.0123.
[38] MORSE R E, FRIEDLAND K D, TOMMASI D, et al. Distinct zooplankton regime shift patterns across ecoregions of the US Northeast continental shelf Large Marine Ecosystem[J]. J Mar Syst, 2017, 165: 77-91. DOI:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.09.011.
[39] 杨宇峰,王庆,陈菊芳,等.河口浮游动物生态学研究进展[J].生态学报, 2006, 26(2): 576-585. DOI:1000-0933(2006)02-0576-10.
[40] 姜会超,陈海刚,宋秀凯,等.莱州湾金城海域浮游动物群落结构及与环境因子的关系[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(22): 7308-7319. DOI:10.5846/stxb201403260565.
[41] 林青,由文辉,徐凤洁,等.滴水湖浮游动物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(23): 6918-6929. DOI:10.5846/stxb201303030360.
[42] 袁琳娜,杨常亮,李晓铭,等.高原深水湖泊水温日成层对溶解氧、酸碱度、总磷浓度和藻类密度的影响:以云南阳宗海为例[J].湖泊科学, 2014, 26(1): 161-168. DOI:10.18307/2014.0120.
[43] VEERENDRA D N, THIRUMALA S, MANJUNATHA H, et al. Zooplankton diversity and its relationship with physico-chemical parameters in mani reservoir of western ghats, region, hosanagar taluk, shivamoga district Karnataka, India[J]. Juee, 2012, 6(2): 74-77. DOI:10.4090/juee.2012.v6n2.074077.
[44] 吴利,李源玲,陈延松.淮河干流浮游动物群落结构特征[J].湖泊科学, 2015, 27(5): 932-940. DOI:10.18307/2015.0521. (
