Life cycle Environmental impact assessment of a closed-loop LED lamp supply chain

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2018.06.015

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the theory of Life Cycle Assessment and SimaPro software(Version8.0), the Eco-indicator 99 method was used to analyze the life cycle impact of a closed-loop LED lamp supply chain and the results were compared with an open-loop LED lamp supply chain which has the same function unit. Results indicated that the environmental single score of a 21 W LED lamp in the entire process of the closed-loop supply chain was 5.48 Pt. The descending order of the three categories of environmental impact was: human health(3.81 Pt)> resources consumption(1.29 Pt)> ecological environment(0.381 Pt), indicating that the whole process of the closed-loop LED lamp supply chain had the most significant impact on human health. In addition, the environmental single score of the open-loop LED lamp supply chain with the same function unit was 5.71 Pt, increasing by 0.23 Pt compared with the closed-loop supply chain, which indicated that the closed-loop LED lamp supply chain was much more environmental friendly than the open-loop LED lamp supply chain.

Key words: life cycle assessment, LED lamp, closed-loop supply chain, environmental impact

CLC Number:

LONG Zhanlu, WU Jinzhuo, XU Wenxiu, XUE Jinran. Life cycle Environmental impact assessment of a closed-loop LED lamp supply chain[J]. Journal of Hebei University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 38(6): 656-663.

References

[1] LUNN R M, BLASK D E, COOGAN A N, et al. Health consequences of electric lighting practices in the modern world: A report on the National Toxicology Program's workshop on shift work at night, artificial light at night, and circadian disruption[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 607/608:1073-1084. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.056.
[2] 沈建, 吴金卓, 林文树. 锯材产品生命周期影响环境的评价方法与应用[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014, 42(10):135-140.DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.20140721.029. SHENJ, WU J Z, LIN W S. Life cycle impact assessment and its application of sawn timber product[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2014, 42(10):135-140. DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.20140721.029.
[3] 易娅娅, 李倩, 吴艳芳. 基于生命周期法的闭环供应链环境绩效评价研究初探[J]. 物流工程与管理, 2012, 34(3):119-121.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4993.2012.03.045. YI Y Y, LI Q, WU Y F. Evaluating the performance of closed-loop supply chain using life cycle method[J]. Logistics Engineering and Management, 2012, 34(3):120-121. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4993.2012.03.045.
[4] HAROLD K. Impact of closed-loop network configurations on carbon footprints: A case study in copiers[J]. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2011, 55(12):1196-1205. DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.07.001.
[5] KARA S, IBBOTSON S. Embodied energy of manufacturing supply chains[J]. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2011, 4: 317-323. DOI:10.1016/j.cirpj.2011.03.006.
[6] 王超. 基于煤炭生命周期的电煤供应链废气排放研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2011. WANG C. Research of electrical coal supply chain's waste gas emissions based on coal life cycle[D].Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2011.
[7] CHAABANE A, RAMUDHIN A, PAQUE M. Design of sustainable supply chain under the emission trading scheme[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 135(1):37-49. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.025
[8] 王爱华. 竹/木质产品生命周期评价及其应用研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2007. WANG A H. Life cycle assessment of bamboo/wood products and its application[D]. Beijing: Chinese academy of forestry, 2007.
[9] HELIAS A U H, OLIVIER J, GREG N, et al. UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative: background, aims and scope[J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7(4):192-195. DOI: 10.1007/BF02978872.
[10] 孔琳琳, 吴金卓, 董希斌, 等. 低质林改造对资源消耗及生态环境的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2017(12):1-7.DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2017.12.001. KONG L L, WU J Z, DONG X B, et al. Effect of Low-quality forest transformation on resources consumption and ecological environment[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2017(12):1-7. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2017.12.001.