Community structure of phytoplankton in summer of the Fuhe River,Baiyangdian Basin and their indication on water quality

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2023.01.010

Abstract

Abstract: To explore the phytoplankton community structure and water quality of the Fuhe River, a upstream river of Baiyangdian Lake, quantitative investigations of phytoplankton were carried out in summer of 2020 at 5 sections in the Fuhe River, and water quality was evaluated according to the dominant- DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2023.01.010白洋淀流域府河夏季浮游植物的群落结构及其对水质的指示张仲伟¹,陈思宝¹,汪家鑫¹,熊飞²,喻记新²(1.长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司水利部长江治理与保护重点实验室,湖北武汉 430010;2.江汉大学生命科学学院,湖北省汉江流域特色生物资源保护开发与利用工程技术研究中心,湖北武汉 430056)摘要:为探究白洋淀入淀河流府河的浮游植物群落结构和水质现状,于2020年夏季对府河5个采样断面的浮游植物进行了定量调查,并基于浮游植物的优势种、密度、生物量和群落多样性指数对府河夏季的水质进行了评价.结果显示:府河夏季共鉴定出浮游植物7门111种属,群落组成以绿藻门、硅藻门为主,其次是蓝藻门,优势种包括微囊藻(Microcystis sp.)、小环藻(Cyclotella sp.)、细小平裂藻(Merismopedia minima)、冠盘藻(Stephanodiscus sp.)和集星藻(Actinastrum hantzschii).各采样断面浮游植物密度和生物量的均值分别为13.51×10⁶ ind/L、5 748.8×10^-3 mg/L,各采样断面浮游植物的Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(H)、Margalef丰富度指数(D)和Pielou均匀度指数(J)的均值分别为2.36、3.25和0.59,显示夏季府河浮游植物的多样性较高.根据浮游植物的优势种、密度和生物量,夏季府河整体水质状况为中-富营养;根据H、D值,夏季府河整体水质状况为β-中污染;根据J值,夏季府河整体水质状况为轻度污染,综合评价结果显示夏季府河水质状况为轻-中度污染水平.关键词:浮游植物;群落结构;水质;生物学评价;府河;白洋淀中图分类号:X826 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1000-1565(2023)01-0067-08Community structure of phytoplankton in summer of the Fuhe River,Baiyangdian Basin and their indication on water qualityZHANG Zhongwei¹, CHEN Sibao¹, WANG Jiaxin¹, XIONG Fei², YU Jixin²(1.Key Laboratory of Changjiang Regulation and Protection of Ministry of Water Resources,Changjiang Survey Planning Design and Research Co. Ltd., Wuhan 430010, China; 2.Hubei Engineering Research Center for Protection and Utilization of Special Biological Resources in the Hanjiang River Basin, School of Life Sciences, Jianghan University,Wuhan 430056, China)Abstract: To explore the phytoplankton community structure and water quality of the Fuhe River, a upstream river of Baiyangdian Lake, quantitative investigations of phytoplankton were carried out in summer of 2020 at 5 sections in the Fuhe River, and water quality was evaluated according to the dominant- 收稿日期:2022-04-26 基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFD0900502);长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司项目(CX2019Z54) 第一作者:张仲伟(1979—),男,河南信阳人,长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司高级工程师,主要从事水利水电工程环境影响评价、环保设计与研究.E-mail: zhangzhongwei@cjwsjy.com.cn 通信作者:喻记新(1990—),男,湖北黄冈人,江汉大学讲师,博士,主要从事水生态环境监测与保护研究.E-mail:jxyu001@126.com第1期张仲伟等:白洋淀流域府河夏季浮游植物的群落结构及其对水质的指示species, density, biomass and community diversity indexes of phytoplankton. A total of 111 species, belong to 7 phyla, were identified, and the community was mainly composed of Chlorophyta and Bacillariophyta, followed by Cyanophyta. The main dominant species were Microcystis sp., Cyclotella sp., Merismopedia minima, Stephanodiscus sp. and Actinastrum hantzschii. The average density and biomass of phytoplankton were 13.51×10⁶ ind/L and 5 748.8×10^-3 mg/L, respectively, and the average Shannon-Wiener diversity index(H), Margalef index richness(D)and Pielou evenness index(J)of phytoplankton community were 2.36, 3.25 and 0.59 respectively, indicating the high diversity of phytoplankton in the Fuhe River in summer. According to the evaluation methods of phytoplankton, the dominant species, density and biomass based water quality indicated the Fuhe River was mesotrophic-eutrophic in summer, the H and D based water quality indicated β-medium pollution, the J based water quality indicated mild pollution, and the overall phytoplankton based evaluation result indicated mild-medium pollution.

Key words: phytoplankton, community structure, water quality, biological assessment, Fuhe River, Baiyangdian

CLC Number:

X826

ZHANG Zhongwei, CHEN Sibao, WANG Jiaxin, XIONG Fei, YU Jixin. Community structure of phytoplankton in summer of the Fuhe River,Baiyangdian Basin and their indication on water quality[J]. Journal of Hebei University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 43(1): 67-74.

References

[1] LEPIST L, HOLOPAINEN A L, VUORISTO H. Type-specific and indicator taxa of phytoplankton as a quality criterion for assessing the ecological status of Finnish boreal lakes[J]. Limnologica, 2004, 34(3): 236-248. DOI:10.1016/S0075-9511(04)80048-3.
[2] 胡鸿钧,魏印心.中国淡水藻类: 系统、分类及生态[M].北京: 科学出版社, 2006.
[3] 唐涛,蔡庆华,刘建康.河流生态系统健康及其评价[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(9):1191-1194.
[4] 董旭辉,羊向东,王荣.长江中下游地区湖泊富营养化的硅藻指示性属种[J].中国环境科学,2006,26(5):570-574.
[5] 况琪军,马沛明,胡征宇,等.湖泊富营养化的藻类生物学评价与治理研究进展[J].安全与环境学报,2005,5(2):87-91.
[6] PHILLIPS G, LYCHE-SOLHEIM A, SKJELBRED B, et al. A phytoplankton trophic index to assess the status of lakes for the Water Framework Directive[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2013, 704(1): 75-95. DOI:10.1007/s10750-012-1390-8.
[7] 鲁敏,熊飞,刘红艳,等.三角湖浮游植物群落结构与水质评价[J].水生态学杂志, 2014, 35(6): 61-66. DOI:10.15928/j.1674-3075.2014.06.009.
[8] 金磊,李林钰,周杨,等.白洋淀三大典型水域浮游植物群落及水质评价[J].河北大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 37(3): 329-336.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2017.03.017
[9] LIANG J, HUANG C, STEVENSON M A, et al. Changes in summer diatom composition and water quality in urban lakes within a metropolitan area in central China[J]. International Review of Hydrobiology, 2020, 105:1-12.DOI:10.1002/iroh.201801953.
[10] 李英华,崔保山,杨志峰.白洋淀水文特征变化对湿地生态环境的影响[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(1):62-68.
[11] 张素珍,田建文,李贵宝.白洋淀湿地面临的生态问题及生态恢复措施[J].水土保持通报, 2007,27(3): 146-150. DOI:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2007.03.032.
[12] 朱金峰,周艺,王世新,等.白洋淀湿地生态功能评价及分区[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(2):459-472.DOI:10.5846/stxb201901280209.
[13] 张笑欣,易雨君,刘泓汐,等.城市化背景下白洋淀入湖营养盐负荷模拟研究[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(19): 7521-7529.DOI: 10.5846 / stxb202006061468.
[14] 孙添伟,陈家军,王浩,等.白洋淀流域府河干流村落非点源负荷研究[J].环境科学研究, 2012, 25(5): 568-572.DOI:10.13198/j.res.2012.05.90.suntw.005.
[15] 龙幸幸,杨路华,夏辉,等.白洋淀府河入淀口周边水质空间变异特征分析[J].水电能源科学, 2016, 34(9): 35-38.
[16] 王珺,高高,裴元生,等.白洋淀府河中氮的来源与迁移转化研究[J].环境科学, 2010,31(12): 2905-2910. DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.2010.12.035.
[17] 杜奕衡,刘成,陈开宁,等.白洋淀沉积物氮磷赋存特征及其内源负荷[J]. 湖泊科学,2018, 30(6): 1537-1551. DOI:10.18307/2018.0606.
[18] 陈兴宏,李立青,张美一,等.白洋淀府河影响区沉积物营养盐和重金属污染特征及风险评价[J].环境科学, 2022, 43(1): 230-238. DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202105200.
[19] 张琪,苑博,周静,等.基于附着藻类多样性和 TLI 的府河水质评价[J].河北大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 40(5): 536-542. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2020.05.012.
[20] 孙洪欣,杨阳,王倩倩,等.府河流域污灌状况及农户对污灌与人体健康关系的认知调查分析[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(2):197-200.
[21] 李悦昭,陈海洋,孙文超.“河-湖”沉积物重金属环境特征及来源解析[J].环境科学,2020, 41(6): 2646-2652. DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.201910215.
[22] 方慷,刘存歧,杨军.大清河水系保定段城市河道浮游植物群落结构及水质评价[J].水生态学杂志, 2013, 34(3): 25-31. DOI:10.15928/j.1674-3075.2013.03.003.
[23] 张铁坚,王朦,彭艳侠,等.白洋淀上游城市内河浮游动物群落调查与水质评价[J].环境工程, 2016, 34(3): 166-169, 132. DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.201603034.
[24] 付显婷,杨薇,苏梦,等.白洋淀河湖系统轮虫群落结构时空动态及与环境因子的关系[J].水生态学杂志, 2020, 41(5): 124-135. DOI:10.15928/j.1674-3075.2020.05.015.
[25] 刘幸春,王洪杰,王亚利,等.府河水体及沉积物细菌群落结构分布特征及其影响因素[J].生态毒理学报, 2021, 16(5): 120-135.DOI:10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210107001.
[26] 田艺苑,杨薇,刘强,等.白洋淀流域水文连通对浮游植物群落的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(7): 1538-1547.DOI:10.11654/jaes.2020-1337.
[27] 鲍艳磊, 田冰,张瑜,等.雄安新区河流健康评价[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(15):5988-5997.DOI: 10.5846 / stxb202004070817.
[28] 章宗涉,黄祥飞.淡水浮游生物研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1991.
[29] 陈家长,孟顺龙,尤洋,等.太湖五里湖浮游植物群落结构特征分析[J].生态环境学报,2009, 18(4):1358-1367. DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2009.04.036.
[30] 邱阳凌,林育青,刘俊杰,等.淮河干流及主要支流夏季浮游植物群落生物多样性评价[J].环境科学学报, 2018, 38(4): 1665-1672. DOI:10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2017.0408.
[31] 陈佳林,孔凡青,余海军,等.白洋淀湿地浮游植物多样性分析及水质评价[J].湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(19): 59-64, 74. DOI:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.19.013
[32] 杨强,谢平,徐军,等.河流型硅藻水华研究进展[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(S1):159-165. (